Podcasts
Podcasts in Alphabetical Order
Are electricity markets - 5/14/2020
Gürcan Gülen
May 14, 2020
Many still call the dynamic mishmash of policies, regulations, and design changes with constant battles at regulatory agencies and courts "a market". But, when a growing share of investments and operational decisions are taken on the basis of out-of-market compensation of many forms and sources rather than price signals, it is no longer possible to talk about a competitive market. In this podcast, I will support this view and offer an alternative to the pseudo-markets of today.
Asset acquisition during shale play development and land management costs - 8/10/2020
Blake Sutton and Zhen Zhu
August 10, 2020
In this podcast, Zhen Zhu and Blake Sutton discuss the recent characteristics in asset acquisition in U.S. oil and gas upstream sectors and emphasize the land management costs associated with asset acquisition in various parts of the shale plays.
Blake Sutton is an undergraduate economics student and has worked as a landman for 3+ years. He has worked independently and for both large and small brokerages based in the Oklahoma City area.
Zhen Zhu, Ph.D., is a professor of economics who teaches courses in energy economics, business forecasting, energy finance, and energy risk management. He also consults regularly for business and has been an expert witness on issues related to regulated utility cost of capital, load forecasting, energy risk management and so on. See his UCO profile at https://www3.uco.edu/centraldirectory/profiles/2280.
COVID-19 impacts on the oil markets and politics - 4/2/2020
Severin Borenstein and Ryan Kellogg
April 2, 2020
Severin Borenstein |
Ryan Kellogg |
Severin Borenstein and Ryan Kellogg discuss how the sudden downturn in oil demand is affecting suppliers and the politics of oil in the US. How does the extreme price drop affect US production levels from existing wells and drilling of new wells? What makes sense for US policy on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve when oil futures markets are in extreme contango? Ryan and Severin also discuss suggestions among some suppliers and politicians that the US should coordinate with OPEC and Russia to reduce world supply in order to "rationalize prices". They also look at the downstream impacts in refining and the much more drastic drop in the wholesale price of gasoline than diesel or heating oil.
Distinguished Lecturer Series: Oil Demand: Vehicles, Viruses, and Volatility- 1/25/2021
Distinguished Lecturer Series
Oil Demand: Vehicles, Viruses, and Volatility
January 25, 2021
Author: Marianne Kah
In this edition, Columbia University’s Marianne Kah discusses oil demand trends for the short and long-term. Marianne considers impacts on oil demand from the growth of alternative vehicles and the COVID-19 pandemic. She highlights an upcoming Columbia University study done jointly with the University of California, Davis on COVID and oil demand. The study includes four scenarios based on two critical uncertainties around the level of disruption from COVID and government policy interventions aiming to accelerate oil demand destruction. The study will be released in 2021.
During the podcast, Marianne also addresses the concept of peak oil demand, impact of the Biden administration on oil supply and demand, and hydrogen in transportation.
Marianne Kah is an Adjunct Senior Research Scholar and Advisory Board member with Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy. Prior to joining Columbia, she was the Chief Economist of ConocoPhillips at its Houston headquarters for 25 years. In addition, Marianne is a former President of the USAEE and was recipient our organization’s Senior Fellow Award.
The Economics of Flaring in U.S. Shale - 7/21/2020
Mark Agerton
July 21, 2020
Working Paper: Economics of Flaring in US Shale
Flaring of natural gas is one of the most visible signs of pollution in the oil and gas industry and, perhaps paradoxically, one of the least understood. This podcast looks at flaring in the Permian Basin and the Bakken shale---the two biggest sources of U.S. flaring. I look at who's flaring and why. I talk about whether markets will be effective at reducing flaring. I look at what we do and don't know about the climate damages and local air pollution caused by flaring. Finally, I talk about what states are currently doing to limit flaring, and I outline some of the additional options policy-makers have. Some of the most exciting options involve satellite-based remote sensing. |
Mark Agerton is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at UC Davis and a non-resident fellow with the Center for Energy Studies at Rice University's Baker Institute. He works on issues in energy and resource economics. His current research examines several aspects of the U.S. shale boom, including how firms learn where to drill, the economics of mineral leasing, constraints in midstream infrastructure, and market structure in oilfield services. Agerton earned a Ph.D. in Economics from Rice University, an M.A. in Economics from the University of Illinois at Chicago, and a B.A. in Spanish from Davidson College.
The Economy as a Superorganism: How much Can We Control it? - 12/03/2020
Carey W. King
December 3, 2020
In this podcast Carey discusses content from his new book, The Economic Superorganism:
Beyond the Competing Narratives on Energy, Growth, and Policy, that relates to how some economists, ecologists, and other scientists view the economy as a system that has evolved in the same manner as biological organisms. For reasons we don’t necessarily fully understand, the economy seems to pursue what is known as the maximum power principle and increasing rates of work output (in the thermodynamic sense of work). Carey discusses some of the philosophical and policy-related questions arising out of this concept, such as whether there is some inherent growth imperative that is making it difficult for we, as humans, to invoke enough agency to pursue long-term goals such as a low-carbon energy transition.
Dr. Carey W King is Research Scientist at The University of Texas at Austin and Assistant Director at the Energy Institute. Carey performs interdisciplinary research related to how energy systems interact within the economy and environment as well as how our policy and social systems can make decisions and tradeoffs among these often competing factors. The past performance of our energy systems is no guarantee of future returns, yet we must understand the development of past energy systems. Carey's research goals center on rigorous interpretations of the past to determine the most probable future energy pathways.
Energy Access Through the Lens of Human Security and Human Rights - 10/25/2020
Häly Laasme
October 25, 2020
In this podcast Häly Laasme discusses the complexities of Energy Access - availability, reliability, affordability, sustainability, efficiency - from the perspective of Human Security, importance of collaboration in multifaceted hybrid systems, and if the Energy Access should be incontestably incorporated into the Universal Human Rights Framework.
Häly Laasme is currently Delaware Energy Assistance Director. She serves as the Northeast Regional Representative in the Board of Directors of National Energy Assistance Director's Association (NEADA) for Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Additionally, she serves on the Board of Directors of Energy Services Coalition (ESC) and in the Advisory Board of Directors of National Energy and Utility Affordability Coalition (NEUAC). In 2019, her persistent efforts brought together two major US energy associations, NEADA and United States Energy Association (USEA), to voice their common concerns over Energy Access and Affordability in the United States, which was broadcasted by C-SPAN. She successfully contested transparency of the methodology of the global Sustainable Development Indicators of Energy Access published by the World Bank Group and Oxford University Global Data Lab that led to the following clarifications on their websites: "Countries considered as "developed" by the UN, and classified as high income are assumed to have an electrification rate of 100% from the first year the country entered the category." Her work in security is part of the Cicero Foundation's Great Debate Series and has been published in the official journals of the US Joint Chief of Staff, "Joint Force Quarterly," and NATO, "NATO Review". She has a magna cum laude degree in economics from Columbia University and she has successfully completed all the required courses for the International Acquisition Level 1 Training, by the Department of Defense, Defense Acquisition University.
Energy Justice and a Just Transition - 6/23/2020
Sanya Carley
June 23, 2020
The energy transition in the United States, as well as elsewhere across the world, generates disparities in benefits and burdens across both people and places. In this podcast, I discuss the justice dimensions of the energy transition, including its effects on frontline communities, energy insecure households, and those that do not have access to the various opportunities provided by the transition. I then discuss two of my recent research efforts. The first focuses on energy justice programs across the U.S., and the degree to which local entities are responding to vulnerabilities associated with the energy transition, or not when they offer such programs. The second focuses on the increased prevalence of energy insecurity among American households during the COVID-19 pandemic, and which populations most impacted.
Dr. Sanya Carley is a Professor and Director of the Master of Public Affairs programs at the O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University. Her research focuses on electricity and transportation policy, energy justice and a just transition, energy-based economic development, and public perceptions of energy infrastructure and technologies. She is a coeditor of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. She received her Ph.D. in public policy from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and bachelor's degrees in economics and sustainable development from Swarthmore College.
Heterogeneity and Energy Policy - 5/27/2020
Janie Chermak
May 27, 2020
Local energy policy, at a state or country level, often finds limited support from residents. Heterogeneity of preferences is explored as a driver of this. In this podcast, I focus on the impact of heterogeneity on an "all of the above" energy policy in the state of New Mexico, where we find significant divergent preferences in a preferred energy plan specific to the type of energy, but consistency in terms of the importance of impact on jobs. While the focus is state specific, consideration of the impact of heterogeneity is general. This work was funded in part by National Science Foundation EPSCoR Cooperative Agreements OIA-1757207 and OAS- 1301346.
It is time to replace LCOE - 5/14/2020
Gürcan Gülen
May 14, 2020
The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is commonly used by the media but is seriously flawed. It is of dubious value for long-term planning to meet growing electricity demand or even to reduce emissions at the lowest system cost. It is useless in real-time system operations to balance demand and supply instantaneously while maintaining reliability. It doesn't capture regional differences in its inputs, specifics of each power system, or the value of different operational characteristics to the system reliability. It is time to replace it. To build on its current prominence, today's generic LCOE can be augmented by the costs of system integration to get a system LCOE, which is still imperfect but a more accurate representation of overall system costs. For policy discussions, we need to add the costs of externalities and subsidies. Only then, we have a useful metric, on which we can base discussions about a least-cost portfolio approach to transitioning electric power systems to achieve environmental and consumer goals.
Supplemental Information: Time to Replace LCOE
Long-term Energy Scenario Planning for Better Decisions - 8/16/2020
Anna (Ebers) Broughel
August 16, 2020
This podcast introduces the method of scenario planning and explains how it can be applied for energy foresight in the years 2040 and beyond. The podcast discusses similarities in over 60 different energy scenarios that have been developed by consultancies, energy companies, and international organizations. Based on this scenario review, the speaker presents four meta-scenarios that describe alternative states of the world after the pandemic. One scenario, the Dark Horse, designates artificial intelligence as the driving force for the energy transitions.
Anna (Ebers) Broughel is a renewable energy economist at an engineering consulting firm Tetra Tech. Her most recent research reviewed over 60 international energy scenarios for 2040 and beyond, developing four main scenarios for post-COVID19 energy futures. Prior to joining Tetra Tech, she worked at the U.S. Department of Energy as a Science and Technology Fellow. During her post-doctoral training at the University of St.Gallen in Switzerland and at the University of Maryland, College Park, she researched social acceptance of wind energy and other energy technologies. She holds a Ph.D. in economics and policy from the State University of New York in association with Syracuse University, where she was a Fulbright scholar. Currently, she serves as a council member for the U.S. Association for Energy Economics and is a non-resident fellow at the University of Texas at Austin. In the past, Dr. Broughel has taught classes in energy policy and climate change as an adjunct professor at the University of Maryland, College Park.
Oil Supply Manager Misconceptions - 7/20/2020
Jonathan Chanis
July 20, 2020
Recent oil market developments have encouraged renewed talk about the need for a "global oil market supply manager." The latest rendition of this notion even suggests that the United States, either by itself or in concert with Saudi Arabia and/or Russia could play such a role. However, enthusiasm for this idea is based on a number of misconceptions about how a global oil supply manager would operate, and about the most important source of extreme oil price volatility.
As Managing Member of New Tide Asset Management, LLC, Jonathan Chanis consults on energy, geopolitics, and macroeconomics, and he trades and invests for his own account. Previously, as Senior Vice President of Policy at Securing America's Future Energy, Jonathan was responsible for planning and directing the research, analysis, and writing of SAFE's policy team. Before joining SAFE, Jonathan taught graduate students at Columbia University about energy security and scenario planning, and he consulted on petroleum and natural gas security, and supply and value chain management. For 20 years prior to this, Jonathan traded and invested in energy and emerging market equities, and commodities, and currencies. He was a Senior Trader at Caxton Associates, a Vice President at Goldman Sachs' commodities division (J. Aron & Co.), and a Managing Director at Tribeca Global Management (a division of Citigroup).
OPEC as a Destabilizing Influence - 7/20/2020
Marc Vatter
July 20, 2020
I begin by observing that oil prices have been far more volatile in the "OPEC Era" of oil pricing than in the previous era of the Seven Sisters and the Texas Railroad Commission. I explain that OPEC benefits from volatility because 1) short-run net demand to OPEC is very inelastic, unlike long-run net demand, 2) asymmetric effects of oil prices on world GDP imply multiple equilibrium prices for the cartel, and 3) fluctuations in price initiated by OPEC cause its revenues to vary countercyclically with macroeconomic activity, allowing OPEC to earn a risk premium in financial markets. I describe a history of destabilizing behavior, discuss the effect of the shale boom on OPEC's market power, and address an opposing point of view.
OPEC as a Destabilizing Influence - Slides
OPEC as a Destabilizing Influence - References
Regulatory Barriers to the Growth of Low Carbon Electricity - 6/11/2019
Russel Gold
June 11, 2019
Author and journalist Russel Gold identifies regulatory barriers to the growth of low carbon electricity while discussing his new book, Superpower: One Man's Quest to Transform American Energy. He highlights pathways for overcoming those barriers, the importance of individuals in shifting energy paradigms, and the role of USAEE member research in the energy transition. The interview also includes an interesting twist on the classic chicken and egg challenge in Energy.
The trials and tribulations of A&D during an oil price crash - 5/14/2020
Helen Croskell
May 14, 2020
During times of economic uncertainty and volatility - from a financial or oil price crash or both - the acquisitions and divestment market tends to dry up. On top of that, sellers typically believe the value of their asset is still determined by the past oil price, but buyers are looking for a bargain. This is where creative deal terms such as contingent payments and swaps come to the fore. In this podcast, I explore where we are today and what I expect to happen in the next eighteen months, and talk about four ways to bridge the valuation gap during uncertain times.
Social Acceptance of Wind Energy: Evidence from Cross-Country Surveys - 9/17/2020
Anna (Ebers) Broughel
September 17, 2020
This podcast is dedicated to the matters of public acceptance and investor acceptance of wind energy technologies in Europe and the US. The talk provides insights on best project development practices, ranging from utilization of immersive virtual reality technology for project visualizations to describing the community's preferences with respect to wind project characteristics. The talk touches upon willingness-to-invest in community finance in different countries, as well as the role of the third-party project developers in the energy transition.
Anna (Ebers) Broughel is an energy economist and statistician at Tetra Tech, with a decade of experience in energy project management and data analysis. Prior to joining Tetra Tech, Dr. Ebers worked as a technical project manager at the Solar Energy Technologies Office of the U.S. Department of Energy. During 4 years of her post-doctoral training, she researched permitting barriers to large energy projects, working collaboratively with co-authors from Sweden, Austria, Germany, and other countries, and presented to a wide range of audiences at both academic and industry conferences.
She holds an MA from the University of Konstanz, Germany, and a Ph.D. in economics and policy from the State University of New York in association with Syracuse University, where she was a Fulbright scholar. After completing her post-doctoral work at the University of St.Gallen, Switzerland, she gained further professional experience as a researcher and lecturer at the University of Maryland, College Park. Currently, she serves as a council member for the U.S. Association for Energy Economics and a non-resident fellow at the University of Texas at Austin.
The Status of Women in Energy Leadership - 12/6/2018
Edie Fraser
December 6, 2018
Edie Fraser, founder, and chair of STEMConnector and Million Women Mentors, was the keynote speaker at the 2018 USAEE/IAEE North American Conference in Washington, DC. Before her keynote, she agreed to talk in-depth with USAEE about the status of women in leadership positions in the energy industries; which sectors of the energy world have been most successful about promoting women; and some specific success stories and larger lessons for all energy firms. Edie discusses how some of the challenges in the promotion of women to leadership roles can be addressed through changes in company culture and values, while others are more deeply rooted in the educational and professional pipeline for students in STEM fields.
U.S. Shale-Oil Production Peak: Civilization's Ultimate Energy Forecast - 7/30/2020
Professor Douglas B. Reynolds, Ph.D.
July 30, 2020
This podcast, based on the working paper of the same name, explains why petroleum is the best physical type of energy. It then talks about how the search for energy proceeds, including the economics of the Hubbert curve. It looks at U.S. shale-oil potential supplies by falsifying various hypotheses. Finally, an explanation about how civilizations are defined and energetically sustained is given in order to show parallels between previous civilizations and our own.
Dr. Douglas B. Reynolds is a professor of petroleum and energy economics at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. He has lived, worked, and studied in many countries. He has worked on energy-economic models for Alaska. He lived in the former Soviet Union just after the fall. He has published multiple articles, books and book chapters and has an academic Google Hirsch Index of 15. His full CV of articles based on each article's relative importance in descending order can be found at scholarworks@UA at: http://hdl.handle.net/11122/11180.
Unanswered Questions: Our Energy Models - 6/16/2020
John W. Ballantine, Jr.
Mohammed AlMehdar
June 16, 2020
How well do our energy models answer our questions -- do they provide frameworks to analyze our energy challenges? What price, how much supply/demand imbalance, and where should we invest? Over the past fifty years, our energy models have evolved and become more sophisticated, however, the question remains, how well have they predicted prices and answered our changing energy (and climate) challenges?
In this slide podcast, I will briefly describe five energy models that have attempted to answer different questions at different points in time.
- Hoteling and Hubbert: resource supply curve and decline/peaks
- Adelman and oligopoly market structure: influence and impact of major players
- Partial and general equilibrium: regional supply mix, market demand, and supply chains
- VAR, price volatility, and complex oil market: supply and demand surprises with swing producers
- Heterogeneous energy markets: Agent actions/behavior, game theory strategies
Of course, along with these models/frameworks, we have market analysts trying to pick the winning players. Looking back we know that none of these models have been able to fully capture the boom-bust cycles of our energy markets, nor predict prices in two to three years. Nonetheless, over the past fifty years, our models have been able to suggest new approaches. They have framed our thinking and helped some plan/invest in our changing energy landscape.
John W. Ballantine, Jr. is a senior lecturer at Brandeis International Business School. For the past twenty years, he has taught courses in global economics, investments, and energy/climate to undergraduates and graduate students. He has a Ph.D. in economics from the NYU Stern School and a master's degree in public policy from the University of Chicago. He has worked as a consultant with Arthur D. Little, a banker with Chase Bank, and a public relations analyst with Ashland Oil. Ballantine has been a research visitor with KAPSARC in Saudi Arabia. His current research involved agent-based partial equilibrium models.
Mohammed AlMehdar is an economics Ph.D. candidate at Brandeis University building agent-based energy models and writing his dissertation on complexity theory / computational economics.
Up the down staircase: What history teaches us about oil demand after a crisis - 4/20/2020
Marie Fagan
April 20, 2020
Although the scale of oil demand destruction from the Covid-19 pandemic is unprecedented, it does not mean there are no precedents to help us think about what oil demand will look like after the crisis passes. London Economics International recently completed a study of 40+ years of global oil supply and demand shocks, to understand how oil demand responds after a crisis. What history teaches us is that declines in global oil intensity come in large stair-steps, not gradually. And once oil intensity drops down a stair-step, it does not fully recover to previous levels, even after many years.
The US Oil and Gas Renaissance: Implications for Global Energy - 12/24/2019
Guy Caruso
December 24, 2019
Tune in to the recent USAEE PODCAST with our former USAEE president and current CSIS Senior Adviser Guy Caruso. Guy discusses the geopolitical implications of the shale revolution, "energy dominance," the potential for peak demand, shale's impact on decarbonization efforts, and more.
USAEE19 Government Track: Funding Session: Elaine Ulrich
Title: USAEE19 Government Track: Funding Session: Elaine Ulrich
Date: February 13, 2020
Podcasts by Topic
Cost
Are electricity markets - 5/14/2020
Gürcan Gülen
May 14, 2020
Many still call the dynamic mishmash of policies, regulations, and design changes with constant battles at regulatory agencies and courts "a market". But, when a growing share of investments and operational decisions are taken on the basis of out-of-market compensation of many forms and sources rather than price signals, it is no longer possible to talk about a competitive market. In this podcast, I will support this view and offer an alternative to the pseudo-markets of today.
Electric
Are electricity markets - 5/14/2020
Gürcan Gülen
May 14, 2020
Many still call the dynamic mishmash of policies, regulations, and design changes with constant battles at regulatory agencies and courts "a market". But, when a growing share of investments and operational decisions are taken on the basis of out-of-market compensation of many forms and sources rather than price signals, it is no longer possible to talk about a competitive market. In this podcast, I will support this view and offer an alternative to the pseudo-markets of today.
It is time to replace LCOE - 5/14/2020
Gürcan Gülen
May 14, 2020
The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is commonly used by the media but is seriously flawed. It is of dubious value for long-term planning to meet growing electricity demand or even to reduce emissions at the lowest system cost. It is useless in real-time system operations to balance demand and supply instantaneously while maintaining reliability. It doesn't capture regional differences in its inputs, specifics of each power system, or the value of different operational characteristics to the system reliability. It is time to replace it. To build on its current prominence, today's generic LCOE can be augmented by the costs of system integration to get a system LCOE, which is still imperfect but a more accurate representation of overall system costs. For policy discussions, we need to add the costs of externalities and subsidies. Only then, we have a useful metric, on which we can base discussions about a least-cost portfolio approach to transitioning electric power systems to achieve environmental and consumer goals.
Supplemental Information: Time to Replace LCOE
General Economics
Are electricity markets - 5/14/2020
Gürcan Gülen
May 14, 2020
Many still call the dynamic mishmash of policies, regulations, and design changes with constant battles at regulatory agencies and courts "a market". But, when a growing share of investments and operational decisions are taken on the basis of out-of-market compensation of many forms and sources rather than price signals, it is no longer possible to talk about a competitive market. In this podcast, I will support this view and offer an alternative to the pseudo-markets of today.
COVID-19 impacts on the oil markets and politics - 4/2/2020
Severin Borenstein and Ryan Kellogg
April 2, 2020
Severin Borenstein |
Ryan Kellogg |
Severin Borenstein and Ryan Kellogg discuss how the sudden downturn in oil demand is affecting suppliers and the politics of oil in the US. How does the extreme price drop affect US production levels from existing wells and drilling of new wells? What makes sense for US policy on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve when oil futures markets are in extreme contango? Ryan and Severin also discuss suggestions among some suppliers and politicians that the US should coordinate with OPEC and Russia to reduce world supply in order to "rationalize prices". They also look at the downstream impacts in refining and the much more drastic drop in the wholesale price of gasoline than diesel or heating oil.
It is time to replace LCOE - 5/14/2020
Gürcan Gülen
May 14, 2020
The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is commonly used by the media but is seriously flawed. It is of dubious value for long-term planning to meet growing electricity demand or even to reduce emissions at the lowest system cost. It is useless in real-time system operations to balance demand and supply instantaneously while maintaining reliability. It doesn't capture regional differences in its inputs, specifics of each power system, or the value of different operational characteristics to the system reliability. It is time to replace it. To build on its current prominence, today's generic LCOE can be augmented by the costs of system integration to get a system LCOE, which is still imperfect but a more accurate representation of overall system costs. For policy discussions, we need to add the costs of externalities and subsidies. Only then, we have a useful metric, on which we can base discussions about a least-cost portfolio approach to transitioning electric power systems to achieve environmental and consumer goals.
Supplemental Information: Time to Replace LCOE
Regulatory Barriers to the Growth of Low Carbon Electricity - 6/11/2019
Russel Gold
June 11, 2019
Author and journalist Russel Gold identifies regulatory barriers to the growth of low carbon electricity while discussing his new book, Superpower: One Man's Quest to Transform American Energy. He highlights pathways for overcoming those barriers, the importance of individuals in shifting energy paradigms, and the role of USAEE member research in the energy transition. The interview also includes an interesting twist on the classic chicken and egg challenge in Energy.
Global
COVID-19 impacts on the oil markets and politics - 4/2/2020
Severin Borenstein and Ryan Kellogg
April 2, 2020
Severin Borenstein |
Ryan Kellogg |
Severin Borenstein and Ryan Kellogg discuss how the sudden downturn in oil demand is affecting suppliers and the politics of oil in the US. How does the extreme price drop affect US production levels from existing wells and drilling of new wells? What makes sense for US policy on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve when oil futures markets are in extreme contango? Ryan and Severin also discuss suggestions among some suppliers and politicians that the US should coordinate with OPEC and Russia to reduce world supply in order to "rationalize prices". They also look at the downstream impacts in refining and the much more drastic drop in the wholesale price of gasoline than diesel or heating oil.
The Economy as a Superorganism: How much Can We Control it? - 12/03/2020
Carey W. King
December 3, 2020
In this podcast Carey discusses content from his new book, The Economic Superorganism:
Beyond the Competing Narratives on Energy, Growth, and Policy, that relates to how some economists, ecologists, and other scientists view the economy as a system that has evolved in the same manner as biological organisms. For reasons we don’t necessarily fully understand, the economy seems to pursue what is known as the maximum power principle and increasing rates of work output (in the thermodynamic sense of work). Carey discusses some of the philosophical and policy-related questions arising out of this concept, such as whether there is some inherent growth imperative that is making it difficult for we, as humans, to invoke enough agency to pursue long-term goals such as a low-carbon energy transition.
Dr. Carey W King is Research Scientist at The University of Texas at Austin and Assistant Director at the Energy Institute. Carey performs interdisciplinary research related to how energy systems interact within the economy and environment as well as how our policy and social systems can make decisions and tradeoffs among these often competing factors. The past performance of our energy systems is no guarantee of future returns, yet we must understand the development of past energy systems. Carey's research goals center on rigorous interpretations of the past to determine the most probable future energy pathways.
Oil Supply Manager Misconceptions - 7/20/2020
Jonathan Chanis
July 20, 2020
Recent oil market developments have encouraged renewed talk about the need for a "global oil market supply manager." The latest rendition of this notion even suggests that the United States, either by itself or in concert with Saudi Arabia and/or Russia could play such a role. However, enthusiasm for this idea is based on a number of misconceptions about how a global oil supply manager would operate, and about the most important source of extreme oil price volatility.
As Managing Member of New Tide Asset Management, LLC, Jonathan Chanis consults on energy, geopolitics, and macroeconomics, and he trades and invests for his own account. Previously, as Senior Vice President of Policy at Securing America's Future Energy, Jonathan was responsible for planning and directing the research, analysis, and writing of SAFE's policy team. Before joining SAFE, Jonathan taught graduate students at Columbia University about energy security and scenario planning, and he consulted on petroleum and natural gas security, and supply and value chain management. For 20 years prior to this, Jonathan traded and invested in energy and emerging market equities, and commodities, and currencies. He was a Senior Trader at Caxton Associates, a Vice President at Goldman Sachs' commodities division (J. Aron & Co.), and a Managing Director at Tribeca Global Management (a division of Citigroup).
OPEC as a Destabilizing Influence - 7/20/2020
Marc Vatter
July 20, 2020
I begin by observing that oil prices have been far more volatile in the "OPEC Era" of oil pricing than in the previous era of the Seven Sisters and the Texas Railroad Commission. I explain that OPEC benefits from volatility because 1) short-run net demand to OPEC is very inelastic, unlike long-run net demand, 2) asymmetric effects of oil prices on world GDP imply multiple equilibrium prices for the cartel, and 3) fluctuations in price initiated by OPEC cause its revenues to vary countercyclically with macroeconomic activity, allowing OPEC to earn a risk premium in financial markets. I describe a history of destabilizing behavior, discuss the effect of the shale boom on OPEC's market power, and address an opposing point of view.
OPEC as a Destabilizing Influence - Slides
OPEC as a Destabilizing Influence - References
History
Energy Justice and a Just Transition - 6/23/2020
Sanya Carley
June 23, 2020
The energy transition in the United States, as well as elsewhere across the world, generates disparities in benefits and burdens across both people and places. In this podcast, I discuss the justice dimensions of the energy transition, including its effects on frontline communities, energy insecure households, and those that do not have access to the various opportunities provided by the transition. I then discuss two of my recent research efforts. The first focuses on energy justice programs across the U.S., and the degree to which local entities are responding to vulnerabilities associated with the energy transition, or not when they offer such programs. The second focuses on the increased prevalence of energy insecurity among American households during the COVID-19 pandemic, and which populations most impacted.
Dr. Sanya Carley is a Professor and Director of the Master of Public Affairs programs at the O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University. Her research focuses on electricity and transportation policy, energy justice and a just transition, energy-based economic development, and public perceptions of energy infrastructure and technologies. She is a coeditor of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. She received her Ph.D. in public policy from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and bachelor's degrees in economics and sustainable development from Swarthmore College.
History
None at this time.
Justice/Human Rights
Energy Access Through the Lens of Human Security and Human Rights - 10/25/2020
Häly Laasme
October 25, 2020
In this podcast Häly Laasme discusses the complexities of Energy Access - availability, reliability, affordability, sustainability, efficiency - from the perspective of Human Security, importance of collaboration in multifaceted hybrid systems, and if the Energy Access should be incontestably incorporated into the Universal Human Rights Framework.
Häly Laasme is currently Delaware Energy Assistance Director. She serves as the Northeast Regional Representative in the Board of Directors of National Energy Assistance Director's Association (NEADA) for Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Additionally, she serves on the Board of Directors of Energy Services Coalition (ESC) and in the Advisory Board of Directors of National Energy and Utility Affordability Coalition (NEUAC). In 2019, her persistent efforts brought together two major US energy associations, NEADA and United States Energy Association (USEA), to voice their common concerns over Energy Access and Affordability in the United States, which was broadcasted by C-SPAN. She successfully contested transparency of the methodology of the global Sustainable Development Indicators of Energy Access published by the World Bank Group and Oxford University Global Data Lab that led to the following clarifications on their websites: "Countries considered as "developed" by the UN, and classified as high income are assumed to have an electrification rate of 100% from the first year the country entered the category." Her work in security is part of the Cicero Foundation's Great Debate Series and has been published in the official journals of the US Joint Chief of Staff, "Joint Force Quarterly," and NATO, "NATO Review". She has a magna cum laude degree in economics from Columbia University and she has successfully completed all the required courses for the International Acquisition Level 1 Training, by the Department of Defense, Defense Acquisition University.
Energy Justice and a Just Transition - 6/23/2020
Sanya Carley
June 23, 2020
The energy transition in the United States, as well as elsewhere across the world, generates disparities in benefits and burdens across both people and places. In this podcast, I discuss the justice dimensions of the energy transition, including its effects on frontline communities, energy insecure households, and those that do not have access to the various opportunities provided by the transition. I then discuss two of my recent research efforts. The first focuses on energy justice programs across the U.S., and the degree to which local entities are responding to vulnerabilities associated with the energy transition, or not when they offer such programs. The second focuses on the increased prevalence of energy insecurity among American households during the COVID-19 pandemic, and which populations most impacted.
Dr. Sanya Carley is a Professor and Director of the Master of Public Affairs programs at the O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University. Her research focuses on electricity and transportation policy, energy justice and a just transition, energy-based economic development, and public perceptions of energy infrastructure and technologies. She is a coeditor of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. She received her Ph.D. in public policy from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and bachelor's degrees in economics and sustainable development from Swarthmore College.
Models
Long-term Energy Scenario Planning for Better Decisions - 8/16/2020
Anna (Ebers) Broughel
August 16, 2020
This podcast introduces the method of scenario planning and explains how it can be applied for energy foresight in the years 2040 and beyond. The podcast discusses similarities in over 60 different energy scenarios that have been developed by consultancies, energy companies, and international organizations. Based on this scenario review, the speaker presents four meta-scenarios that describe alternative states of the world after the pandemic. One scenario, the Dark Horse, designates artificial intelligence as the driving force for the energy transitions.
Anna (Ebers) Broughel is a renewable energy economist at an engineering consulting firm Tetra Tech. Her most recent research reviewed over 60 international energy scenarios for 2040 and beyond, developing four main scenarios for post-COVID19 energy futures. Prior to joining Tetra Tech, she worked at the U.S. Department of Energy as a Science and Technology Fellow. During her post-doctoral training at the University of St.Gallen in Switzerland and at the University of Maryland, College Park, she researched social acceptance of wind energy and other energy technologies. She holds a Ph.D. in economics and policy from the State University of New York in association with Syracuse University, where she was a Fulbright scholar. Currently, she serves as a council member for the U.S. Association for Energy Economics and is a non-resident fellow at the University of Texas at Austin. In the past, Dr. Broughel has taught classes in energy policy and climate change as an adjunct professor at the University of Maryland, College Park.
Oil
COVID-19 impacts on the oil markets and politics - 4/2/2020
Severin Borenstein and Ryan Kellogg
April 2, 2020
Severin Borenstein |
Ryan Kellogg |
Severin Borenstein and Ryan Kellogg discuss how the sudden downturn in oil demand is affecting suppliers and the politics of oil in the US. How does the extreme price drop affect US production levels from existing wells and drilling of new wells? What makes sense for US policy on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve when oil futures markets are in extreme contango? Ryan and Severin also discuss suggestions among some suppliers and politicians that the US should coordinate with OPEC and Russia to reduce world supply in order to "rationalize prices". They also look at the downstream impacts in refining and the much more drastic drop in the wholesale price of gasoline than diesel or heating oil.
Distinguished Lecturer Series: Oil Demand: Vehicles, Viruses, and Volatility- 1/25/2021
Distinguished Lecturer Series
Oil Demand: Vehicles, Viruses, and Volatility
January 25, 2021
Author: Marianne Kah
In this edition, Columbia University’s Marianne Kah discusses oil demand trends for the short and long-term. Marianne considers impacts on oil demand from the growth of alternative vehicles and the COVID-19 pandemic. She highlights an upcoming Columbia University study done jointly with the University of California, Davis on COVID and oil demand. The study includes four scenarios based on two critical uncertainties around the level of disruption from COVID and government policy interventions aiming to accelerate oil demand destruction. The study will be released in 2021.
During the podcast, Marianne also addresses the concept of peak oil demand, impact of the Biden administration on oil supply and demand, and hydrogen in transportation.
Marianne Kah is an Adjunct Senior Research Scholar and Advisory Board member with Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy. Prior to joining Columbia, she was the Chief Economist of ConocoPhillips at its Houston headquarters for 25 years. In addition, Marianne is a former President of the USAEE and was recipient our organization’s Senior Fellow Award.
Oil Supply Manager Misconceptions - 7/20/2020
Jonathan Chanis
July 20, 2020
Recent oil market developments have encouraged renewed talk about the need for a "global oil market supply manager." The latest rendition of this notion even suggests that the United States, either by itself or in concert with Saudi Arabia and/or Russia could play such a role. However, enthusiasm for this idea is based on a number of misconceptions about how a global oil supply manager would operate, and about the most important source of extreme oil price volatility.
As Managing Member of New Tide Asset Management, LLC, Jonathan Chanis consults on energy, geopolitics, and macroeconomics, and he trades and invests for his own account. Previously, as Senior Vice President of Policy at Securing America's Future Energy, Jonathan was responsible for planning and directing the research, analysis, and writing of SAFE's policy team. Before joining SAFE, Jonathan taught graduate students at Columbia University about energy security and scenario planning, and he consulted on petroleum and natural gas security, and supply and value chain management. For 20 years prior to this, Jonathan traded and invested in energy and emerging market equities, and commodities, and currencies. He was a Senior Trader at Caxton Associates, a Vice President at Goldman Sachs' commodities division (J. Aron & Co.), and a Managing Director at Tribeca Global Management (a division of Citigroup).
OPEC as a Destabilizing Influence - 7/20/2020
Marc Vatter
July 20, 2020
I begin by observing that oil prices have been far more volatile in the "OPEC Era" of oil pricing than in the previous era of the Seven Sisters and the Texas Railroad Commission. I explain that OPEC benefits from volatility because 1) short-run net demand to OPEC is very inelastic, unlike long-run net demand, 2) asymmetric effects of oil prices on world GDP imply multiple equilibrium prices for the cartel, and 3) fluctuations in price initiated by OPEC cause its revenues to vary countercyclically with macroeconomic activity, allowing OPEC to earn a risk premium in financial markets. I describe a history of destabilizing behavior, discuss the effect of the shale boom on OPEC's market power, and address an opposing point of view.
OPEC as a Destabilizing Influence - Slides
OPEC as a Destabilizing Influence - References
Up the down staircase: What history teaches us about oil demand after a crisis - 4/20/2020
Marie Fagan
April 20, 2020
Although the scale of oil demand destruction from the Covid-19 pandemic is unprecedented, it does not mean there are no precedents to help us think about what oil demand will look like after the crisis passes. London Economics International recently completed a study of 40+ years of global oil supply and demand shocks, to understand how oil demand responds after a crisis. What history teaches us is that declines in global oil intensity come in large stair-steps, not gradually. And once oil intensity drops down a stair-step, it does not fully recover to previous levels, even after many years.
Policy
Heterogeneity and Energy Policy - 5/27/2020
Janie Chermak
May 27, 2020
Local energy policy, at a state or country level, often finds limited support from residents. Heterogeneity of preferences is explored as a driver of this. In this podcast, I focus on the impact of heterogeneity on an "all of the above" energy policy in the state of New Mexico, where we find significant divergent preferences in a preferred energy plan specific to the type of energy, but consistency in terms of the importance of impact on jobs. While the focus is state specific, consideration of the impact of heterogeneity is general. This work was funded in part by National Science Foundation EPSCoR Cooperative Agreements OIA-1757207 and OAS- 1301346.
Regulatory
None at this time.
Regulatory
A.I. in Energy: Theory and Practice
29 July 2020
A.I. in Energy: Theory and Practice
Recent Analyses of CCUS Impact at the Global, National and Regional Scale
20 July 2020
Recent Analyses of CCUS Impact at the Global, National and Regional Scale
Shale
Asset acquisition during shale play development and land management costs - 8/10/2020
Blake Sutton and Zhen Zhu
August 10, 2020
In this podcast, Zhen Zhu and Blake Sutton discuss the recent characteristics in asset acquisition in U.S. oil and gas upstream sectors and emphasize the land management costs associated with asset acquisition in various parts of the shale plays.
Blake Sutton is an undergraduate economics student and has worked as a landman for 3+ years. He has worked independently and for both large and small brokerages based in the Oklahoma City area.
Zhen Zhu, Ph.D., is a professor of economics who teaches courses in energy economics, business forecasting, energy finance, and energy risk management. He also consults regularly for business and has been an expert witness on issues related to regulated utility cost of capital, load forecasting, energy risk management and so on. See his UCO profile at https://www3.uco.edu/centraldirectory/profiles/2280.
The Economics of Flaring in U.S. Shale - 7/21/2020
Mark Agerton
July 21, 2020
Working Paper: Economics of Flaring in US Shale
Flaring of natural gas is one of the most visible signs of pollution in the oil and gas industry and, perhaps paradoxically, one of the least understood. This podcast looks at flaring in the Permian Basin and the Bakken shale---the two biggest sources of U.S. flaring. I look at who's flaring and why. I talk about whether markets will be effective at reducing flaring. I look at what we do and don't know about the climate damages and local air pollution caused by flaring. Finally, I talk about what states are currently doing to limit flaring, and I outline some of the additional options policy-makers have. Some of the most exciting options involve satellite-based remote sensing. |
Mark Agerton is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at UC Davis and a non-resident fellow with the Center for Energy Studies at Rice University's Baker Institute. He works on issues in energy and resource economics. His current research examines several aspects of the U.S. shale boom, including how firms learn where to drill, the economics of mineral leasing, constraints in midstream infrastructure, and market structure in oilfield services. Agerton earned a Ph.D. in Economics from Rice University, an M.A. in Economics from the University of Illinois at Chicago, and a B.A. in Spanish from Davidson College.
Wind
Social Acceptance of Wind Energy: Evidence from Cross-Country Surveys - 9/17/2020
Anna (Ebers) Broughel
September 17, 2020
This podcast is dedicated to the matters of public acceptance and investor acceptance of wind energy technologies in Europe and the US. The talk provides insights on best project development practices, ranging from utilization of immersive virtual reality technology for project visualizations to describing the community's preferences with respect to wind project characteristics. The talk touches upon willingness-to-invest in community finance in different countries, as well as the role of the third-party project developers in the energy transition.
Anna (Ebers) Broughel is an energy economist and statistician at Tetra Tech, with a decade of experience in energy project management and data analysis. Prior to joining Tetra Tech, Dr. Ebers worked as a technical project manager at the Solar Energy Technologies Office of the U.S. Department of Energy. During 4 years of her post-doctoral training, she researched permitting barriers to large energy projects, working collaboratively with co-authors from Sweden, Austria, Germany, and other countries, and presented to a wide range of audiences at both academic and industry conferences.
She holds an MA from the University of Konstanz, Germany, and a Ph.D. in economics and policy from the State University of New York in association with Syracuse University, where she was a Fulbright scholar. After completing her post-doctoral work at the University of St.Gallen, Switzerland, she gained further professional experience as a researcher and lecturer at the University of Maryland, College Park. Currently, she serves as a council member for the U.S. Association for Energy Economics and a non-resident fellow at the University of Texas at Austin.
Women
None at this time.